Solar System Formation & Dynamics

ASTR 3710 Fall 2013

Lecture 3: Transit and radial velocity surveys

The transit method is conceptually the simplest way to detect extrasolar planets. The “night side” of a planet emits essentially no optical radiation, so if the planet passes directly in front of the disk of the star as seen from Earth it acts as a black disk that temporarily blocks some fraction of the star light. Transits can be seen in the Solar System. In June 2012 the transit of Venus was visible from Earth:

480px-NASA's_SDO_Satellite_Captures_First_Image_of_2012_Venus_Transit_(Full_Disc)

For other stars, of course, we are generally unable to resolve the stellar disk. The signature of an extrasolar planetary transit is thus not an image of a small black circle crossing the face of the star, but rather a temporary drop in the brightness of the star as some of its light is blocked by the planet. (A more subtle difference is that the Earth is quite close to Venus, so the disk of Venus transiting the Sun is larger than it would appear for a distant observer seeing the same event from interstellar distances.)

The fractional drop in stellar brightness during a planetary transit can be calculated from simple geometry. The stellar disk has an area \pi R_*^2, while the planetary disk has area \pi R_p^2. The fraction of star light that is blocked is thus,

f = \left( R_p / R_* \right)^2.

Jupiter has a radius that is about 10% that of the Sun (i.e. R_p / R_* \approx 0.1). The same is true, roughly speaking, for all gas giant planets with masses between about a Saturn mass and up to 10 Jupiter masses. For Jupiter and other gas giant, then, we expect,

f_{Jup} \approx 10^{-2}.

For the Earth (radius 6600km), the depth of a transit as it crosses the Sun (radius 696,000km) is,

f_\oplus \approx 9 \times 10^{-5}.

The cartoon below shows what we expect the light curve to look like in the specific case of a gas giant that produces a roughly 1% dip in the stellar flux:

figure_Ch1_transit

The most basic observables of a transit survey are:

  • The depth of the transit f – this is a direct measure of the relative size of the planet as compared to its host star.
  • The period of the orbit P, which can be measured directly if a series of successive transits are observed. For a planet orbiting a star of mass M_* at semi-major axis a, P = 2 \pi \sqrt{a^3 / GM_*}.

Inspection of the above formulae shows that measuring the period and transit depth are not sufficient to tell us all that much about the planet and its orbit. If, however, we have a good estimate of the stellar properties – its mass and radius – then the transit measurements give us the physical size of the planet and the semi-major axis of its orbit. The importance of good knowledge of the host star is relevant for the Kepler mission, whose ultra-precise photometry means that uncertainty in stellar parameters is a significant source of overall uncertainty in measured planetary properties.

For ground-based observatories, the primary limitation on the planets that can be detected via the transit method comes from atmospheric fluctuations, which limit the precision to which the stellar flux can be measured. The attainable precision is not a strong function of the size of the telescope, and the most successful surveys to date have used dedicated arrays of small telescopes to scan wide areas of the sky in search of planets orbiting relatively bright stars. (These offer the best targets for follow-up once planets have been found.) The SuperWASP search, for example, uses an array of 8 telephoto camera lenses, which have a field of view of 8 degrees on a side:

wasp

The atmospheric limitations mean that ground-based transit surveys are able to detect the 1% dips caused by gas giants, but are unable to detect the two orders of magnitude smaller signals produced by transiting Earth-like planets. (At least in the visible for Solar-type stars – the MEarth project targets smaller stars, around which even terrestrial planets can produce transit depths accessible from the ground.)

From space there are no atmospheric limitations, and the main barrier to detecting transits of small planets is instead the intrinsic variability of the stars themselves. Even stars that we don’t think of as being “variable” – like the Sun – vary in brightness by small amounts as star spots and other surface features form and rotate through the visible disk. NASA’s Kepler mission was designed to be able to detect transits of Earth-like planets at around 1 AU (i.e. in the habitable zone) around stars whose intrinsic noise properties were similar to those of the Sun. In practice, the realized transit detection efficiency for such planets around the actual sample of Kepler stars was not quite as good as predicted, and with the failure of the Kepler spacecraft’s pointing it is not clear whether any true extrasolar Earth analogs will be recovered from the data. Nonetheless, Kepler discovered a large number of small – probably terrestrial – planets, including Kepler-37b that has a size comparable to the Moon.

The radial velocity (or Doppler) method relies on the fact the orbital motion of a planet induces a counter-balancing (or “reflex”) motion in the star. In general, for a binary system the two orbiting bodies describe elliptical orbits about the center of mass of the binary. If the binary is made up of two equal mass stars, the center of mass will lie midway between them. In the case of a star-planet system, the center of mass will typically be inside the physical radius of the star, but not at the center. As the planet orbits, the star will then execute a much smaller orbit around the center of mass,

figure_Ch1_circular

The idea of the radial velocity method is to indirectly detect the planet by observing the reflex motion of the star. This can be done by measuring the line of sight (“radial”) component of the stellar motion by observing the Doppler shift of spectral lines produced in the atmosphere of the star. We can estimate the size of the effect by calculating the orbital velocity of the star as it executes its small orbit about the center of mass. We first note that the orbital velocity of a planet on a circular orbit at distance a from a star of mass M_* is,

v = \sqrt{GM_* / a}.

Conservation of linear momentum in the binary implies that when the planet is moving toward us with this velocity, the star must be moving away at a velocity v_* such that the star and the planet have equal and opposite momenta, i.e.

M_* v_* = M_p v.

Substituting, we get the stellar velocity as,

v_* = \left( \frac{M_p}{M_*} \right) \sqrt{ \frac{GM_*}{a} }.

This would be the maximum radial velocity we would see if the orbit was exactly edge-on to us, at the moment when the star was coming directly toward us. If instead, the orbit is inclined at an angle i (as shown in the figure above) we see only the component of the stellar orbital velocity that is projected along our line of sight. The semi-amplitude of the radial velocity curve is then,

K = v_* \sin i = \left( \frac{M_p}{M_*} \right) \sqrt{ \frac{GM_*}{a} } \sin i.

Substituting numbers, we find that the radial velocity signature that the planets in the Solar System induce on the Sun is,

v_* \simeq 12 ms^{-1} (Jupiter)

v_* \simeq 0.1 ms^{-1} (Earth).

Currently, the most precise measurements of stellar radial velocities attain roughly 1 m/s precision. A wide range of planets can be detected via this technique, though it is not yet possible to find Earths within the habitable zone of Solar-type stars.

The basic observables of a radial velocity survey are,

  • The period of the orbit. As with a transit survey, this gives us the semi-major axis of the planetary orbit provided we have good knowledge of the stellar mass.
  • The semi-amplitude of the radial velocity oscillation K. If we know the orbital inclination i, then together with the stellar mass this gives us the planetary mass. In the more normal case where we don’t know the inclination, we can only deduce a minimum mass for the planet.
  • The time-dependence of the radial velocity oscillation. If the orbit of the planet is circular this will be a simple sinusoid. For larger eccentricities, the curve will look more like a sawtooth, reflecting the fact that both the planet and the star are moving fastest during the brief period of closest approach. Some examples of curves for eccentric orbits are shown below,

    figure_Ch1_eccentric

    By fitting the shape of such curves, the eccentricity e can be measured.

Transits and radial velocity measurements furnish independent information about extrasolar planetary systems. The transit method gives the most direct information on planetary sizes, while the radial velocity method gives information about planetary masses. If, fortuitously, we can observe transits and measure the radial velocity signal for the same planet, then combining the information gives the mass, the radius, and hence the density.

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started